Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Virginia Mason and Social Media Content

Virginia Mason Medical Center’s content is revealing and interesting to its followers because they only post information that the followers would want to know about. They don’t overload their followers with unnecessary information or promotions. Rather, they help to inform followers of news and health events, both local and national. I previously mentioned that they have separate Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube accounts; one as the main page and the other for careers. They do a great job of keeping information relevant on both accounts with each type of social media site. Having these separate accounts shows that Virginia Mason is thinking ahead about the content they post. They want to make sure they don’t mix career related content with other sorts of information. Content is important on social media, and it seems that Virginia Mason is aware of that.

The article What Makes a Social Media Influencer states “Content is king, but context is queen. 50% of respondents said that the single most important action a person or brand can take to increase their influence online was to “create, post or share compelling content”. Virginia Mason handles content well. For example on their main Facebook page you will see facts such as “The liver is the 2nd most important organ in your body, performing jobs vital to your overall health” while on their career Facebook page you will see headlines such as “Find out why being an Optimist will get you ahead in your career”.

Lastly, the article Importance of Content Curation discussed “content curation” which basically means saving your prospects time by having easily available, relevant information for them. Thus by using this practice you will save prospects time, while also gaining their trust. Content curation works in three steps: Identify, organize, and share. An important statistic to point out: “58% of participants in a 2009 survey clicked on a news article that agreed with their views vs. 43% clicked on a news article that disagreed with their views”.


No comments:

Post a Comment